AP – Thousands of workers at more than 200 U.S. Starbucks stores plan to walk off the job Thursday in what organizers say is the largest strike yet in the two-year-old effort to unionize the company’s stores.
The Workers United union chose Starbucks’ annual Red Cup Day to stage the walkout since it’s usually one of the busiest days of the year. Starbucks expects to give away thousands of reusable cups Thursday to customers who order holiday drinks.
The union said it was expecting more than 5,000 workers to take part in its “Red Cup Rebellion.” Around 30 stores also staged walkouts on Wednesday.
Neha Cremin, a Starbucks barista in Oklahoma City, said she was striking to protest understaffing in stores, especially during promotions like Red Cup Day. Cremin said workers are already overwhelmed filling delivery orders, drive-thru orders, mobile orders and in-store orders; promotions add another layer of stress.
“Understaffing hurts workers and also creates an unpleasant experience for customers,” Cremin said. “Starbucks has made it clear that they won’t listen to workers, so we’re advocating for ourselves by going on strike.”
Thursday’s strike was the fifth major labor action by Starbucks workers since a store in Buffalo, New York, became the first to unionize in late 2021. Workers at 110 stores walked out last year on Red Cup Day; most recently, a strike in June protested reports that Starbucks had removed Pride displays from its stores.
But the strikes have had little impact on Starbucks’ sales. For its 2023 fiscal year, which ended Oct. 1, Starbucks reported its revenue rose 12%,to a record $36.0 billion.
Starbucks downplayed any potential impact of the strike Wednesday, saying it would occur at a “small subset” of the company’s 9,600 company-owned U.S. stores.
“We remain committed to working with all partners, side-by-side, to elevate the everyday, and we hope that Workers United’s priorities will shift to include the shared success of our partners and negotiating contracts for those they represent,” Starbucks said in a statement.
At least 363 company-operated Starbucks stores in 41 states have voted to unionize since late 2021. The Starbucks effort was at the leading edge of a period of labor activism that has also seen strikes by Amazon workers, auto workers and Hollywood writers and actors.
At least 457,000 workers have participated in 315 strikes in the U.S. just this year, according to Johnnie Kallas, a Ph.D. candidate and the project director of Cornell University’s Labor Action Tracker.
Starbucks opposes the unionization effort and has yet to reach a labor agreement with any of the stores that have voted to unionize. The process has been contentious; regional offices with the National Labor Relations Board have issued 111 complaints against Starbucks for unfair labor practices, including refusal to bargain. Starbucks says Workers United is refusing to schedule bargaining sessions.
Starbucks noted that it has started bargaining with the Teamsters union, which organized a Starbucks store outside of Pittsburgh in June 2022. But the two sides have not reached a labor agreement. The Teamsters didn’t say Wednesday whether workers at the unionized store would also be striking.
Relations between Starbucks and Workers United have grown increasingly tense. Last month, Starbucks sued Workers United, saying a pro-Palestinian post on a union account damaged its reputation and demanding that the union stop using the name Starbucks Workers United. Workers United responded with its own lawsuit, saying Starbucks defamed the union by suggesting it supports terrorism and violence.
BOYCOTT BIG BUSINESS?
“Starbucks has been so openly hostile to conservatives that it is worth taking the CEO seriously when he says that he doesn’t want our business … “
by Frank DeVito, 3.15.2023
FIRSTTHINGS.COM – Should conservatives boycott companies that support evil causes?
Various boycott movements have emerged within the culture war over the years, and for good reasons. An effort to boycott Target due to several woke policies, including the corporation’s public decision to allow men who identify as women to use women’s restrooms, is underway.
For over a decade, Christians have been debating whether boycotting Starbucks is warranted, given the company’s long-standing opposition to traditional marriage. And of course, there is Amazon. Michael Warren Davis wrote a great piece a few years ago on why conservatives should delete their Amazon Prime accounts. And he is quite right.
Clearly the answer to the initial question is “yes”; there are ample reasons for conservatives to boycott major companies that stand for and promote terrible cultural evils. But is there a point to singling out particularly woke companies, when almost every major company participates in evil causes? Is it worthwhile and proper to pick and choose?
I think this is a prudential judgment. I don’t think one can often make the case that a certain major corporation is so bad that conservatives are morally obligated to boycott it. Yes, Target and Starbucks openly support causes hostile to conservative values. But when practically every company—from AT&T to Verizon, American Express to Morgan Stanley, Nike to Ben & Jerry’s—contributes to Planned Parenthood, it is difficult to single out one major corporation as significantly more evil than the rest.
Nevertheless, perhaps we can single out a few that deserve boycotts. Yes, other major coffee chains may donate to bad causes and support woke policies, but Starbucks has been so openly hostile to conservatives that it is worth taking the CEO seriously when he says that he doesn’t want our business.
So I buy my coffee elsewhere, though I do not think that it is a moral imperative for Christian conservatives to do the same. And I don’t think my decision does much to hurt Starbucks’s bottom line and make it rethink its position …
